Third Party Index

Snapshot 79453

Document
Security page
URL
https://www.gmobility.com/security-compliance/
Fetched
HTTP status
200
Content type
text/html; charset=UTF-8
Fetch mode
static
Size
118688 bytes
SHA-256 (raw)
1ed731209322884a1addb8a238ec92028ad05e855ebed4a9ba390d7ce546229a
SHA-256 (normalized text)
ff3eb47e352f06664185fa1d132af1f60d92cf4fdbcd74df3578561439f102a2

Normalized text

Scripts and page chrome removed; this is what change detection compares.

Security & Compliance
Finding the risk is easy.
Fixing it is the work.
Most tools produce thousands of findings and no way to know which five matter. We rank by what an attacker would actually reach, then remediate with an audit trail.
Talk to an Engineer Need security engineers instead?
How it works
Ranked by reachability, not by CVSS.
A severity score tells you how bad a vulnerability is in theory. Blast radius tells you what it reaches in your environment. Only the second one tells you what to fix on Monday.
// Six findings left open with written rationale beats ninety-two force-closed for a green dashboard.
Worked example
92 findings, one day, six left open on purpose.
A HIPAA-regulated client was carrying 92 open security findings that had sat for months. Not because nobody cared, but because remediating that volume by hand is weeks of senior engineer time, and every change in a regulated environment needs an audit trail.
We ran remediation with an engineer approving every single change. The interesting part is not the speed, it is the six we did not fix.
Those six were closed as documented exceptions with written rationale, because remediating them would have broken a dependent workload. A green dashboard with those force-fixed would have looked better and been worse, and an auditor can tell the difference.
Before
92 open findings, aged months, manual remediation estimated in weeks.
After
6 documented exceptions. Every other finding closed as a reviewed change.
Environment
HIPAA-regulated
Elapsed
One day
Human review
Every change
Left open
6, with rationale
What we do
Posture, identity and evidence.
Six hundred plus automated checks across nine or more frameworks, then controlled remediation with an audit trail an assessor will accept.
Posture assessment
Read-only scan ranked by exploitability and blast radius. Results back within a day of access, nothing touching production.
IAM & least privilege
Over-privilege analysis across every identity, unused permission removal and escalation paths mapped rather than assumed.
Vulnerability remediation
Findings closed as reviewed changes, or documented as accepted exceptions with written rationale. There is no third option.
Compliance readiness
SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, CIS, NIST 800-53 and ISO 27001 control mapping with an evidence package for your assessor.
Network segmentation
Lateral movement mapped, security groups tightened, blast radius reduced to something you can describe in a sentence.
Secretless CI/CD
Static deploy credentials replaced with OIDC and short-lived roles, rotated with zero downtime.
Stack
What we build on.
Detection
AWS Security Hub, GuardDuty, Amazon Inspector, Macie, CloudTrail, Config.
Controls
IAM least privilege, IAM Access Analyzer, KMS, mTLS, OIDC, network policy.
Frameworks
SOC 2 readiness, HIPAA, PCI DSS, CIS Benchmarks, NIST 800-53, ISO 27001.
What we will not do
We are not your assessor and we will not tell you that engaging us makes you certified. We prepare environments and evidence so an independent audit goes well. Any firm that offers to both remediate and attest is selling you a conflict of interest.
Get the list of what actually matters.
Read-only access, findings back within a day, and nothing touches production without your approval.
Talk to an Engineer Find Engineering Talent