UiPath
UiPath declares 18 subprocessors in its subprocessor list, which we last checked on Oct 10, 2026 (evidence). They include Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud and OpenAI. Our recent checks could not read the list; these entries are as of Oct 10, 2026. 6 tracked vendors name UiPath as a subprocessor, including Smartsheet, Tungsten Automation and Addepar.
Not loaded by any published homepage.
Subprocessors CSV of UiPath's subprocessors · Atom feed of UiPath's subprocessors DORA draft CSV of UiPath's subprocessors as declared by UiPath what's this? ·
18 third parties.
| Name | Purpose | Location | Listed since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Web | Infrastructure; Integration Service is hosted on | Customer selected | |
| Amazon Web Services, Inc | Providing hosting infrastructure | EU | |
| Atlassian Inc. | Managing tasks for solving product issues or bugs reported by customers; Processing of JIRA Support tickets | EU North region; USA | |
| CTC System Management KK | Managing customer support cases | Japan | |
| Epam | Support ticket resolution, site reliability engineering | Czech Republic, Ukraine, Georgia, India | |
| Google LLC | Hosting and providing virtual infrastructure and generative AI services including Large Language Models Looker services: Scalable, modern data analytics solution. Used in Automation Cloud to unify, transform, describe, and govern the data from various data sources; Infrastructure; Supporting identification of error data if customers actively send recordings for support provisioning | As available here and selected by the customer; Closest region to the customer (EU/USA/Japan); Customer Selected; Only dashboard metadata is stored in the customer selected region for Insights service; | |
| Microsoft Ireland | Hosting and providing virtual; Hosting of Customer Portal through which support tickets are | Customer Selected; USA, EU, Japan | |
| Mongo DB Attom Inc. | Database used to store application related information Used to search for property and real estate data | Customer selected US transiting of searched address | |
| Movate, Inc. | Opening support cases on behalf of customers who reach out through toll free support line | India | |
| Noma Security Inc. | Used for identifying and limiting prompt injection if enabled by the customer | No data storage. Data (prompts) processed in transit in the USA | |
| Okta Inc. (Auth 0) | Identity management services | EU | |
| OpenAI, LLC AI | Generative AI services; Providing generative AI services, such as Large Language Models. | Customer Selected; EU | |
| Operations Limited | being raised.; infrastructure. Generative AI services for All Cloud Software including Large Language Models. Personal data masking with Azure Cognitive Services when enabled by the customer | ||
| Salesforce Inc. | Managing customer support cases and responding to customers about raised issues. | USA | |
| Services, Inc | AWS infrastructure. Generative AI services for Cloud Software including Large Language Models (Claude model is available through AWS) | As available here and selected by the customer | |
| Snowflake Inc. | Data warehouse and analytics; Used as a data warehouse for long-term storage of data and analysis | Customer selected; EU | |
| Twilio Inc. | Used by customers to send in-product notifications (SendGrid Service) and support voice communications | US transiting (contacts and message related data). No data storage for | |
| WorkFusion | Support ticket resolution | India, Poland |
Web TechnologiesCSV of UiPath's web technologies · Atom feed of UiPath's web technologies
UiPath's homepage made 94 requests to 9 domains, and 5 services controlled by another company.
5 third parties by category: Tag managers 1A/B Testing 1Cookie compliance 1CDN 1Other 1
3 tracked companies loaded by the homepage are not in UiPath's subprocessor list. A website can use a service without it processing customer data.
Subprocessor of (6)CSV of the companies listing UiPath · Atom feed of the companies listing UiPath
Addepar addepar.com Provision of automated data transformation and processing functionality on behalf of Addepar.
Envoy Global envoyglobal.com Process automation
O.C. Tanner octanner.com Robotic process automation for large-scale end-to-end automation
Smartsheet smartsheet.com Robotic processing automation
Tungsten Automation tungstenautomation.com In-product Automation; Tungsten Products or Service(s): Tungsten
WonderBotz wonderbotz.com RPA / agentic automation platform
ComplianceCSV of UiPath's compliance · Atom feed of UiPath's compliance
FedRAMP Marketplace
| Offering | Status | Impact | Agencies | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automation Cloud Public Sector | Authorized | Moderate | 12 |
Security program
How UiPath says it manages cybersecurity risk, in its annual report to the SEC.
- Led by
- Chief Information Security Officer · 30+ years of experience
quote
The CISO regularly reports to senior management and the board of directors on the oversight of our information security program.
Our CISO has over 30 years of experience developing and leading IT product security teams across multiple technology domains, and previously held leadership positions at several large technology companies.
- Board oversight
- Audit Committee
quote
The CISO reports at least quarterly to the audit committee of the board of directors.
- Outside review
- Engages outside assessors or consultants
quote
We use third-party service providers to assist, from time to time, in identification, assessment, and management of material risks from information security threats, including but not limited to penetration testing firms, professional services firms, external legal counsel, threat intelligence service providers, information security consultants and software providers, managed cybersecurity service providers, and forensic investigators.
- Its own suppliers
- Reviews their security
quote
Depending on the nature of the services provided, the sensitivity of the Information Assets, Systems, and Data at issue, and the identity of the provider, our vendor management process may involve different levels of assessment designed to help identify information security risks associated with a provider and impose contractual obligations related to information security on the provider, including, for example, conducting risk assessments and vulnerability scans related to our vendors’ services; requiring our vendors to complete security questionnaires; reviewing our vendors’ written security programs and security assessments; conducting and maintaining reports on our vendors; reviewing our vendors' third-party audit reports; conducting security assessment calls with our vendors’ security personnel; and imposing certain contractual obligations on our vendors.
- Practices named
- Incident response plan
- Tabletop exercises
- Penetration testing
- Vulnerability management
- Threat intelligence
- Material incidents
- None so far, it says
quote
We have not identified any cybersecurity incidents or threats that have materially affected us or are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our business strategy, financial condition, or results of operations.
Read Item 1C in full
Risk Management and Strategy
We have implemented and maintain various information security processes designed to identify, assess, and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats (which we refer to as information security threats) to our critical computer networks, third-party hosted services, communications systems, hardware and software, and our critical data. Our critical data includes intellectual property, confidential information that is proprietary, strategic, or competitive in nature, and personal and sensitive information related to our employees, prospective employees, third-party service providers, and our customers. Together, we refer to these systems and data as our Information Assets, Systems, and Data.
Depending on the environment, we implement and maintain various technical, physical, and organizational measures, processes, standards, and policies designed to manage and mitigate material risks from information security threats to our Information Assets, Systems, and Data, including, for example: using manual and automated monitoring tools; conducting scans of our threat environment; subscribing to reports and services that identify information security threats; analyzing reports of threats and actors; evaluating threats reported to us; conducting and using third parties to conduct tests of certain systems; coordinating with law enforcement concerning certain threats; having third parties conduct threat assessments; conducting threat assessments and vulnerability assessments to identify vulnerabilities; evaluating our and our industry’s risk profile; conducting penetration testing; having third parties conduct red/blue team testing and tabletop incident response exercises; using external intelligence feeds; and conducting various threat model exercises. The level of investment and maturity of each of these measures are mapped directly to our risk management program.
Our assessment and management of material risks from information security threats are integrated into our overall risk management processes. For example: (1) information security risk is addressed as a component of our enterprise risk management program and identified in our risk register; (2) the information security team with enterprise input from other teams, including our risk management, internal audit, security, and technology management personnel, works with management to prioritize our risk management processes and mitigate information security threats that have a higher likelihood of leading to a material impact to our business; and (3) our global risk and compliance team, under the direction of our CISO, evaluates material risks from information security threats against our overall business objectives.
We use third-party service providers to assist, from time to time, in identification, assessment, and management of material risks from information security threats, including but not limited to penetration testing firms, professional services firms, external legal counsel, threat intelligence service providers, information security consultants and software providers, managed cybersecurity service providers, and forensic investigators. Further, we use third-party service providers to perform a variety of functions throughout our business, such as application providers and hosting companies. We use certain vendor management processes to help manage information security risks associated with our use of certain of these providers. Depending on the nature of the services provided, the sensitivity of the Information Assets, Systems, and Data at issue, and the identity of the provider, our vendor management process may involve different levels of assessment designed to help identify information security risks associated with a provider and impose contractual obligations related to information security on the provider, including, for example, conducting risk assessments and vulnerability scans related to our vendors’ services; requiring our vendors to complete security questionnaires; reviewing our vendors’ written security programs and security assessments; conducting and maintaining reports on our vendors; reviewing our vendors' third-party audit reports; conducting security assessment calls with our vendors’ security personnel; and imposing certain contractual obligations on our vendors. We apply mitigations and processes based on our evaluation of the sensitivity of the data accessed by the vendor and the maturity of the vendor's programs. Reports from our third-party vendors are treated as an intake to our incident response process. We have not identified any cybersecurity incidents or threats that have materially affected us or are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our business strategy, financial condition, or results of operations. However, like other companies in our industry, we and our third-party vendors have from time to time experienced threats and security incidents that could affect our information or systems.
For a description of the risks from information security threats that may materially affect us and how they may do so, see Risk Factors—Risks Related to Data Privacy and Cybersecurity in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Governance
Our information security risk assessment and management processes are implemented and maintained by certain of our management, including our CISO, our Chief Technology Officer, and our Senior Director of Security Operations. Our CISO has over 30 years of experience developing and leading IT product security teams across multiple technology domains, and previously held leadership positions at several large technology companies. Our Chief Technology Officer has over 20 years of experience in various engineering and product development leadership roles, including most recently as a Corporate Vice President within a large enterprise software company, with strong background in cloud computing, distributed systems, and product development. Our Senior Director of Security Operations has over 14 years of experience in IT security and is a Certified Information Systems Security Professional.
Our CISO and information security team are responsible for hiring appropriate information security personnel, helping to integrate information security risk considerations into our overall risk management strategy, and communicating key priorities to relevant personnel. The CISO and CISO's leadership team are responsible for approving budgets, approving information security processes, helping to prepare for possible cybersecurity incidents, and reviewing security assessments and other security-related reports. Other teams are also involved in aspects of this work.
The CISO regularly reports to senior management and the board of directors on the oversight of our information security program. The CISO is also a member of the senior leadership team that meets quarterly on risk and compliance, which includes executives throughout the company who oversee areas such as finance, accounting, investor relations, people, legal and compliance, IT, and product and engineering. This committee meets regularly, as relevant, to discuss oversight of the information security program, program enhancements, and new risks or threats the company might be facing. The company has established, as part of its incident response program, a smaller senior executive committee to oversee and manage information security incidents or vulnerabilities, assessed by severity and known or threatened impact. Security management and others work with our incident response team to help mitigate and remediate information security incidents of which they are notified. In addition, our incident response plan includes reporting to the board of directors for certain information security incidents.
The CISO reports at least quarterly to the audit committee of the board of directors. Pursuant to its charter, the audit committee has, as an area of focus, the adequacy and effectiveness of our information security and cybersecurity policies and practices. The board of directors retains overall responsibility for assessing our major risks and considering ways to address those risks, and addresses our information security risk management as part of its general oversight function. Through its meetings with management, including the information security, internal audit and legal and compliance functions, the audit committee reviews and discusses significant areas of our business and summarizes key areas of risk and relevant mitigating factors for the board of directors.
Security program from UiPath, Inc.'s Form 10-K for fiscal 2026, filed Mar 25, 2026, Item 1C, in its words (evidence) FedRAMP status from the FedRAMP Marketplace (evidence)
Service statusCSV of UiPath's status page incidents · Atom feed of UiPath's status page incidents
90 days agotoday
- 56 incidents in 90 days
- 17 major or critical
- 1 h 28 min typical time to resolve
- 8 h 3 min longest major
| Began | Incident | Impact | Lasted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Publishing failures in Studio Web | minor | 27 min | |
| Multi-region: Google Sheets and Google Docs connections failing in Integration Service | minor | 1 h 34 min | |
| Multiple Region - User unable to sign-up to cloud.uipath.com | minor | 52 min | |
| US - Robots - Robot logs are delayed | no impact stated | 2 h 24 min | |
| US - Orchestrator- Increased latency in job execution | no impact stated | 23 min | |
| US - Automation Ops - Partial Outage | no impact stated | 2 h 12 min | |
| Multiple regions - Automation Cloud - Partial outage | no impact stated | — | |
| Multiple Regions - Studio Web - Partial Outage | no impact stated | — |
Incidents per month
critical major minor no impact stated
Components affected
| Component | Incidents | Bar |
|---|---|---|
| Orchestrator | 8 | |
| Agentic Orchestration | 4 | |
| Agents | 4 | |
| Action Center | 3 | |
| Automation Ops | 3 | |
| IXP | 3 | |
| Automation Cloud | 2 | |
| Autopilot for Developers | 2 |
As UiPath's status page reports its own incidents (scheduled maintenance left out), read every few hours since (evidence)
Incidents reported by UiPath's subprocessorsCSV of incidents reported by vendors UiPath lists · Atom feed of incidents reported by vendors UiPath lists
221 reported incidents in the last 30 days, by 3 of the vendors UiPath lists as subprocessors.
A subprocessor list names a company, not the service an incident touched. This does not show that UiPath was involved.
And 196 more. All of them: CSV · Who is around them.
ChangesCSV of UiPath's changes · Atom feed of UiPath's changes
See the list as we read it on any date: Time machine
- Changed registry listing: fedramp:FR2132958724 evidence: registry listing: fedramp:FR2132958724