Tenable
Tenable declares 22 subprocessors, plus 12 of its own affiliates, in its subprocessor list, which we last checked on Nov 11, 2026 (evidence). They include Amazon Web Services, Anthropic and Cloudflare. No published changes since we first read it on Nov 5, 2026. 7 tracked vendors name Tenable as a subprocessor, including Atlassian, Bitbucket and SOPHOS.
Not loaded by any published homepage.
Subprocessors CSV of Tenable's subprocessors · Atom feed of Tenable's subprocessors DORA draft CSV of Tenable's subprocessors as declared by Tenable what's this? ·
22 third parties, 12 affiliates.
| Name | Purpose | Location | Listed since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Web Services (AWS) Cloud | Either United States (Virginia, California, Ohio), Germany (Frankfurt), the UK (London), Singapore, Canada, Australia (Sydney), Japan (Tokyo), Brazil (Sao Paolo), India (Mumbai), and the UAE. | ||
| Anthropic PBC (Claude) AI | |||
| Arrow ECS SAS | France | ||
| ClickHouse, Inc | |||
| Cloudflare, Inc | |||
| Coralogix Inc. | United States | ||
| Databricks, Inc. | United States | ||
| Datadog, Inc | United States | ||
| Demandbase, Inc. | United States | ||
| G2.com, Inc. | United States | ||
| Malbec Solutions, Inc. (d/b/a Malbek) | United States | ||
| Marketo, Inc. | United States; Ireland | ||
| Microsoft Operations Ireland Limited (Azure) | France, Ireland, Netherlands, Hong Kong, England, Australia, Singapore, United States, UAE, India | ||
| MongoDB, Inc. | Either United States (Virginia, California, Ohio), Germany (Frankfurt), the UK (London), Singapore, Canada, Australia (Sydney), Japan (Tokyo), Brazil (Sao Paolo), India (Mumbai), and the UAE. | ||
| Pendo.io, Inc. | United States | ||
| Salesforce, Inc. | United States | ||
| SendGrid | United States; UK | ||
| Snowflake Computing Netherlands B.V. | |||
| Sutherland Global Services, Inc. | United States; Philippines | ||
| TaskUs, Inc. | United States | ||
| Twilio | United States | ||
| Zift Solutions, Inc. | United States |
Tenable affiliates (12)
Web TechnologiesCSV of Tenable's web technologies · Atom feed of Tenable's web technologies
Tenable's homepage made 377 requests to 51 domains, 29 services controlled by another company, and 3 domains not identified.
29 third parties by category: Advertising 13Analytics 7Marketing automation 3Live chat 1Other 5
o11.techsecuredvisit.comusbrowserspeed.com
15 tracked companies loaded by the homepage are not in Tenable's subprocessor list. A website can use a service without it processing customer data.
Subprocessor of (7)CSV of the companies listing Tenable · Atom feed of the companies listing Tenable
Atlassian atlassian.com
Bitbucket bitbucket.org
Capsule8 capsule8.com Vulnerability Management Services
IMO Health imohealth.com
SOPHOS sophos.com Vulnerability Management Services
Statuspage statuspage.io
VisibleThread visiblethread.com
ComplianceCSV of Tenable's compliance · Atom feed of Tenable's compliance
Security program
How Tenable says it manages cybersecurity risk, in its annual report to the SEC.
- Led by
- Chief Security Officer reporting to the Co-Chief Executive Officer · 25+ years of experience
quote
Our CSO is responsible for implementing and maintaining our cybersecurity risk assessment and management processes.
The CSO reports directly to our Co-Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Vintz, and provides regular updates to our executive team, Cybersecurity Committee and Board of Directors on certain cybersecurity risks and incidents.
Our CSO has over 25 years of experience in cybersecurity, including serving as a chief security and strategy officer at another company as well as serving over 20 years conducting offensive and defensive cyber operations within
- Board oversight
- Cybersecurity Committee
quote
Our incident response plan is designed to escalate certain cybersecurity incidents to members of management depending on the circumstances, including reporting to the Cybersecurity Committee and the Board of Directors for certain cybersecurity incidents.
- Outside review
- Engages outside assessors or consultants
quote
These methods include conducting vulnerability assessments and threat assessments in certain environments for internal and external threats, scanning certain environments, analyzing certain reports of threats and actors, conducting internal audits for certain systems, evaluating our and our industry’s risk profile, coordinating with law enforcement concerning select threats, and engaging with third-party service providers to conduct external audits, threat assessments for certain systems, provide intelligence feeds, and conduct red/blue team testing and tabletop incident response exercises.
- Its own suppliers
- Reviews their security
quote
We have established processes designed to manage the cybersecurity risks associated with working with third-party service providers.
- Practices named
- Incident response plan
- Tabletop exercises
- Penetration testing
- Vulnerability management
- Threat intelligence
- Cyber insurance
Since the fiscal 2024 report: board oversight by the Cybersecurity Committee (was the Cybersecurity Committee, Audit Committee).
Read Item 1C in full
We recognize the critical importance of developing, implementing, and maintaining robust cybersecurity measures to safeguard our information systems and protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of our data and our exposure management solutions. We have implemented and maintain various information security processes designed to identify, assess and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats to our critical computer networks, third-party hosted services, communications systems, hardware and software, critical data (including without limitation intellectual property, confidential information that is proprietary, strategic or competitive, customer vulnerability data, and information systems data), and exposure management solutions.
Our Information Security function is overseen by our Chief Security Officer, or CSO, and is supported by our Chief Information Officer, Chief Product Officer and Product Engineering Team Leads, Chief Legal Officer, and Head of Global
Privacy. Our Information Security function is responsible for identifying, assessing and managing cybersecurity threats and risks and works to monitor and evaluate our threat environment and risk profile using various methods. These methods include conducting vulnerability assessments and threat assessments in certain environments for internal and external threats, scanning certain environments, analyzing certain reports of threats and actors, conducting internal audits for certain systems, evaluating our and our industry’s risk profile, coordinating with law enforcement concerning select threats, and engaging with third-party service providers to conduct external audits, threat assessments for certain systems, provide intelligence feeds, and conduct red/blue team testing and tabletop incident response exercises.
We implement and maintain various technical, physical, and organizational measures, processes, standards and policies designed to manage and mitigate material risks from cybersecurity threats to our information systems and data depending on the environment. This includes maintaining an incident response plan, exposure management policy, and disaster recovery and business continuity plans, conducting risk assessments for certain environments, implementing certain security standards and certifications for certain products and systems, encrypting certain data in transit and at rest, controlling data access in certain environments, using multiple security controls in certain environments, segregating certain data, monitoring certain systems, performing regular security assessments for certain systems, training employees, maintaining cybersecurity insurance, maintaining dedicated cybersecurity staff, and conducting internal and external penetration tests.
Our assessment and management of material risks from cybersecurity threats are integrated into our overall risk management processes. This integration is designed to ensure that cybersecurity considerations are part of our decision-making processes. Our senior management evaluates material risks from cybersecurity threats against our overall business objectives and reports to the Cybersecurity Risk Management Committee, or Cybersecurity Committee, of the Board of Directors.
We use third-party service providers to assist us from time to time in identifying, assessing, and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats, including for example cybersecurity consultants and software providers, managed cybersecurity service providers, threat intelligence service providers, forensic investigators, penetration testing firms, dark web monitoring services, and professional services firms, including legal counsel and auditors. By partnering with these specialized providers, we can leverage their insights and expertise to continue to refine our cybersecurity strategies and processes.
We have established processes designed to manage the cybersecurity risks associated with working with third-party service providers. We evaluate the risks associated with third parties before engagement and maintain ongoing monitoring of such third parties designed to ensure compliance with our security standards. This includes security questionnaires and assessments, as well as external attack surface management. Depending on the nature of the services provided, the sensitivity of the information systems and data at issue, and the identity of the provider, our vendor management process may involve different levels of assessment designed to help identify cybersecurity risks associated with a provider and impose contractual obligations related to cybersecurity on the provider.
See Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of the risks from cybersecurity threats that may materially affect us and how they may do so.
Governance
Our Board of Directors addresses cybersecurity risk management as part of its general oversight function. The Cybersecurity Committee assists with fulfilling this oversight responsibility for our cybersecurity risk management processes, including oversight and mitigation of risks from cybersecurity threats.
The Cybersecurity Committee bears the primary responsibility for oversight of the management of risks related to the use and protection of information technology, cybersecurity, and product security. The Cybersecurity Committee consists of directors with cybersecurity and other expertise including risk management, technology and finance.
Our CSO is responsible for implementing and maintaining our cybersecurity risk assessment and management processes. Our CSO has over 25 years of experience in cybersecurity, including serving as a chief security and strategy officer at another company as well as serving over 20 years conducting offensive and defensive cyber operations within
the intelligence community and US Cyber Command. Our CSO oversees and maintains our information security management framework and is responsible for defining and implementing our information security strategy, hiring appropriate personnel, communicating key cybersecurity priorities to relevant personnel, and managing cybersecurity budgets and cybersecurity processes.
Our CSO seeks to regularly obtain information about relevant developments in cybersecurity, including potential threats and risk management techniques to help shape our approach to preventing, detecting, mitigating, and remediating cybersecurity threats. Our CSO is also responsible for implementing and overseeing processes for regularly monitoring our information systems and data, including the conducting of periodic audits of certain systems to identify potential vulnerabilities. The CSO reports directly to our Co-Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Vintz, and provides regular updates to our executive team, Cybersecurity Committee and Board of Directors on certain cybersecurity risks and incidents.
In the event of a cybersecurity incident, the CSO initiates our incident response plan that includes actions designed to mitigate the impact and long-term strategies for remediation and prevention of future incidents. Our incident response plan is designed to escalate certain cybersecurity incidents to members of management depending on the circumstances, including reporting to the Cybersecurity Committee and the Board of Directors for certain cybersecurity incidents.
Security program from Tenable Holdings, Inc.'s Form 10-K for fiscal 2025, filed Feb 27, 2026, Item 1C, in its words (evidence)
Service statusCSV of Tenable's status page incidents · Atom feed of Tenable's status page incidents
- major The status page says: Partial System Outage · Tenable One: major outage, Tenable Vulnerability Management: major outage, Tenable Cloud Security: major outage
90 days agotoday
- 32 incidents in 90 days
- 25 major or critical
- 28 h 24 min typical time to resolve
- 12 days longest major
| Began | Incident | Impact | Lasted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenable Cloud Security: Customers Site Access Issues (USGov1) | critical | 5 h 54 min | |
| Tenable Vulnerability Management: Scan Processing Delays | minor | 42 h 36 min | |
| Tenable Vulnerability Management: Delay in Findings | major | 2 days | |
| Tenable Cloud Security: Sync delays | major | 21 h 24 min | |
| Tenable Vulnerability Management: Scheduled Scans Not Launching | major | 2 days | |
| Tenable Cloud Security: Service Degradation on All Sites | major | 2 h 25 min | |
| Tenable One: Delay in Tenable Exposure Management data | major | 2 days | |
| Tenable Vulnerability Management: Unresponsive Cyber Exposure Feed | no impact stated | — |
Incidents per month
critical major minor no impact stated
Components affected
| Component | Incidents | Bar |
|---|---|---|
| AE1 | 2 | |
| AU1 | 2 | |
| BR1 | 2 | |
| CA01 | 2 | |
| CA1 | 2 | |
| EU1 | 2 | |
| FRA | 2 | |
| IN01 | 2 |
As Tenable's status page reports its own incidents (scheduled maintenance left out), read every few hours since (evidence)
Incidents reported by Tenable's subprocessorsCSV of incidents reported by vendors Tenable lists · Atom feed of incidents reported by vendors Tenable lists
217 reported incidents in the last 30 days, by 8 of the vendors Tenable lists as subprocessors.
A subprocessor list names a company, not the service an incident touched. This does not show that Tenable was involved.
And 192 more. All of them: CSV · Who is around them.
ChangesCSV of Tenable's changes · Atom feed of Tenable's changes
See the list as we read it on any date: Time machine
None since tracking began.