PagerDuty
PagerDuty declares 31 subprocessors, plus 4 of its own affiliates, in its subprocessor list, which we last checked on Nov 11, 2026 (evidence). They include Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud and OpenAI. No published changes since we first read it on Sep 21, 2026. 52 tracked vendors name PagerDuty as a subprocessor, including Confluent, Cloudinary and SmartBear Software.
Not loaded by any published homepage.
Subprocessors CSV of PagerDuty's subprocessors · Atom feed of PagerDuty's subprocessors DORA draft CSV of PagerDuty's subprocessors as declared by PagerDuty what's this? ·
31 third parties, 4 affiliates.
| Name | Purpose | Location | Listed since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agap2IT | Customer/Product Support Services | Portugal | |
| Amazon Web Services, Inc. | Artificial Intelligence; Cloud Computing/Data Warehouse Services/Telecom/Email Notification Services | United States; United States, Germany, Ireland1 | |
| Atlassian Corp. | Customer Support Services | United States | |
| Bee Engineering, S.A. | Customer/Product Support Services | Portugal | |
| BrowserStack Inc. | Product Testing | United States; Ireland; India | |
| Catamorphic Co. dba LaunchDarkly | Feature Flagging Services | United States | |
| Crowdstrike Inc. | Security/Production SIEM (Security)/Production Logging (Security) | ||
| Databricks, Inc. | Data Intelligence | United States | |
| Etleap Inc. | Pipeline Data Processing Provider | United States, France1 | |
| Fivetran Inc. | Pipeline Data Processing Provider | United States | |
| FullStory, Inc. | User Experience Tools/Data Analytics Services | United States | |
| Gainsight, Inc. | Customer Support Services | United States | |
| Google LLC | Artificial Intelligence; Location Detection Services, Authentication, and Customer Support Services. | United States | |
| Hound Technology, Inc. d/b/a Honeycomb | Service Observability | United States | |
| Hyperdoc Inc. | Video and Audio Transcription Services | United States; Canada | |
| KTSL Limited | Incident Orchestration | United Kingdom; United States | |
| Mailgun Technologies, Inc. | Email Notification Services | United States, Belgium, Germany1 | |
| Message Bird | SMS & Voice/Telecom Notification Services | United States; Netherlands; Germany; United Kingdom | |
| Microsoft Corporation | Artificial Intelligence; Authentication/Cloud Computing Services Provider/Communication Platform | United States | |
| Okta, Inc. (Auth 0) | Authentication Services | United States | |
| Open AI, L.L.C. AI | Artificial Intelligence | United States | |
| Oso Security, Inc. | Access Control Services | United States | |
| Pendo.io, Inc. | In-App Messaging and guides/User Experience Tools/Data Analytics Services | United States | |
| ReadMe.io Co | Product Documentation | United States | |
| Salesforce, Inc. | Cloud Computing/Application Development/Live Call Routing/Data Analytics Services/Customer Support Services | United States, Ireland1 | |
| Sisense SF, Inc. | Data Analytics Services | United States | |
| Snowflake Inc. | Data Warehouse Services | United States | |
| Twilio Inc. | SMS & Voice/Telecom/Email Notification Services/User Experience Tools | United States | |
| User Testing, Inc. | User Feedback/Product Testing | United States | |
| Variacode Software, S.p.A. | Customer/Product Support Services | Chile; Argentina; Brazil; Colombia; Spain; Portugal; Australia | |
| Vonage Business, Inc. | SMS & Voice/Telecom Notification Services | United States, United Kingdom1 |
Web TechnologiesCSV of PagerDuty's web technologies · Atom feed of PagerDuty's web technologies
PagerDuty's homepage made 138 requests to 16 domains, 7 services controlled by another company, and 1 domain not identified.
7 third parties by category: Analytics 5Advertising 1Cookie compliance 1
thisgreencolumn.com
5 tracked companies loaded by the homepage are not in PagerDuty's subprocessor list. A website can use a service without it processing customer data.
Subprocessor of (52)CSV of the companies listing PagerDuty · Atom feed of the companies listing PagerDuty
Aerospike aerospike.com Incident alerting; On-call and alert management for production incidents and service reliability
AgentSync agentsync.io Support Sub-Processor (Manage, Contracting, API)
Akuity akuity.io On call scheduled and paging
Ampersand ampersand.ai Incident alerting and on-call management; Used to route operational alerts and coordinate incident response.
Apica apica.io Integration for alerting
Atomic.io atomic.io Incident response platform
Blackboard blackboard.com Client alerts
Chatwoot chatwoot.com Incident monitoring & response; Used for operational alerts, on-call management, and incident response.
Check Point Software Technologies checkpoint.com Incident management and alerting platform
Cloudevolve cloudevolve.com Incident management and on-call alerting
Cloudinary cloudinary.com Support & Operations
Confluent confluent.io Alert monitoring
Couchbase couchbase.com Customer support services
DeepScribe deepscribe.ai PagerDuty is used to monitor system uptime and alert engineering teams to performance or availability issues, enabling rapid incident response.
- Ducksify ducksify.com Software as a Service (SaaS)
EverTrue evertrue.com Service monitoring and alerting
Expel expel.com Notification services for legacy customers
Fastmail fastmail.com Support services and Incident management
FundApps fundapps.co
Honeycomb honeycomb.io Incident tracking and response
insightsoftware insightsoftware.com Incident notification and on-call management
Intralinks intralinks.com
Kentik kentik.com - Operational notifications; Transactional email
Loadster loadster.app Issue Escalation & Resolution
Luma AI lumalabs.ai Monitoring and incident management
Neeto neetocal.com Uptime monitoring
Noonlight noonlight.com Cloud Services – Internal IT On-Call Management
OneStream Software onestream.com IT on-call management, alerting, incident tracking, automation, and incident, and alert analytics; Transfer Mechanism subject to EU Standard Contractual Clauses CONTACT: privacy@pagerduty.com
Outline getoutline.com Incident response
Paperform paperform.co Processing period: Jan 1, 2018 - present Data disclosed: Incidental data: Some personal information may be shared during the day-to-day operation of Paperform
pydantic pydantic.dev Incident management and alerting
Qumulo qumulo.com Cloud monitoring; Incident response
Rackspace rackspace.com Products & Services – Security
Read AI read.ai Service fault data; Technical and availability alerting
Reality Defender realitydefender.com
RWX rwx.com Incident management and alerting (limited to incident metadata)
Serverless Framework serverless.com Cloud monitoring; Incident management and alerting platform used to monitor system availability and coordinate operational response.
SigNoz signoz.io
Simple Analytics simpleanalytics.com On-call alerts for our infrastructure
Simpli.fi simpli.fi
SingleStore singlestore.com Alert monitoring; SingleStore utilizes PagerDuty to provide emergency ticket routing. Accordingly, some information that you submit into a support ticket may be processed by PagerDuty.
Sitetracker sitetracker.com Email and Document Storage
SmartBear Software smartbear.com Incident Management
SolarWinds solarwinds.com Customer Support
StoreConnect storeconnect.com
Taimos taimos.de IT management
Teleport goteleport.com Incident Response
Teleskope teleskope.ai Application Monitoring
Ubicloud ubicloud.com Incident notification services
Verda verda.com Cloud monitoring; Privacy policy:
- Show next 2
ComplianceCSV of PagerDuty's compliance · Atom feed of PagerDuty's compliance
FedRAMP Marketplace
| Offering | Status | Impact | Agencies | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PagerDuty Operations Cloud | Authorized | Low | 2 |
Security program
How PagerDuty says it manages cybersecurity risk, in its annual report to the SEC.
- Led by
- Chief Information Security Officer
quote
Company management, including the CTO, CISO, and CIO, is responsible for hiring appropriate personnel, helping to integrate cybersecurity risk considerations into the Company’s overall risk management strategy, and communicating key priorities to relevant personnel.
- Board oversight
- Audit Committee
quote
The audit committee of our board of directors is responsible for overseeing the Company’s cybersecurity risk management processes, including oversight of mitigation of risks from cybersecurity threats.
- Its own suppliers
- Reviews their security
quote
Depending on the environment, system, and data, we implement and maintain certain technical and organizational measures, processes, standards, and policies designed to manage and mitigate material risks from cybersecurity threats to our Information Systems and Data, including, for example: incident response procedures, vulnerability management process, disaster recovery/business continuity plans, encryption, network security controls, user access controls including multifactor authentication and role-based access, data segregation, asset management, systems monitoring, vendor risk management program, employee training, penetration testing, cybersecurity insurance, and dedicated cybersecurity staff.
- Practices named
- Incident response plan
- Penetration testing
- Vulnerability management
- Threat intelligence
- Cyber insurance
Read Item 1C in full
Risk management and strategy
We have implemented and maintain various information security processes designed to identify, assess, and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats to our critical computer networks, third party hosted services, communications systems, hardware and software, and our critical data, including intellectual property, confidential information that is proprietary, strategic, or competitive in nature, customer data, and personal information (collectively, “Information Systems and Data”).
Our Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”) and Chief Information Officer (“CIO”), along with our information security, engineering, and legal functions, help identify, assess, and manage the Company’s cybersecurity threats and risks. They work to identify and assess risks from cybersecurity threats by monitoring and evaluating the threat environment using various methods including manual and automated tools, subscribing to reports and services that identify cybersecurity threats, evaluating our and our industry’s risk profile, conducting audits and threat assessments, conducting vulnerability assessments, and external threat intelligence.
Depending on the environment, system, and data, we implement and maintain certain technical and organizational measures, processes, standards, and policies designed to manage and mitigate material risks from cybersecurity threats to our Information Systems and Data, including, for example: incident response procedures, vulnerability management process, disaster recovery/business continuity plans, encryption, network security controls, user access controls including multifactor authentication and role-based access, data segregation, asset management, systems monitoring, vendor risk management program, employee training, penetration testing, cybersecurity insurance, and dedicated cybersecurity staff.
Our assessment and management of material risks from cybersecurity threats are integrated into the Company’s overall risk management processes, including by prioritizing our risk management processes and mitigating cybersecurity threats that are more likely to lead to a material impact to our business.
We use third-party service providers to assist us from time to time to identify, assess, and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats, including, for example, professional services firms, cybersecurity consultants, managed cybersecurity service providers, and penetration testing firms.
We also use third-party service providers to perform a variety of functions throughout our business, such as application providers, hosting companies, and various supply chain resources. We have a vendor management program to manage cybersecurity risks associated with our use of these providers which includes, depending on the vendor, nature of the services provided, and sensitivity of the Information Systems and Data at issue: different levels of assessment designed to help identify cybersecurity risks associated with the vendor, security questionnaires, review of security assessments, and imposition of contractual obligations related to cybersecurity.
For a description of the risks from cybersecurity threats that may materially affect the Company and how they may do so, see our risk factors under Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Governance
Our board of directors oversees the Company’s cybersecurity risk management as part of its general oversight function. The audit committee of our board of directors is responsible for overseeing the Company’s cybersecurity risk management processes, including oversight of mitigation of risks from cybersecurity threats.
Our cybersecurity risk assessment and management processes are implemented and maintained by certain Company management, including our Chief Technology Officer (“CTO”), CISO, and CIO, who have decades of experience in cybersecurity and information technology. Our CTO has extensive experience in computer science, our CISO has extensive experience in computer security and enterprise data, and our CIO has extensive experience in information technology.
Company management, including the CTO, CISO, and CIO, is responsible for hiring appropriate personnel, helping to integrate cybersecurity risk considerations into the Company’s overall risk management strategy, and communicating key priorities to relevant personnel. Management is also responsible for approving budgets for spending on cybersecurity, helping prepare for cybersecurity incidents, and approving cybersecurity processes.
Our cybersecurity incident response and vulnerability management processes are designed to escalate certain cybersecurity incidents to members of management depending on the circumstances, including to the CISO, CTO, and CIO, as appropriate. The CTO, CISO, and CIO work with the Company’s incident response team to help the Company mitigate and remediate such cybersecurity incidents. In addition, the Company’s incident response and vulnerability management processes include updates to the audit committee of the board of directors as appropriate.
The audit committee receives periodic reports from the CTO and/or CISO concerning the company’s significant cybersecurity threats and risk and the processes the Company has implemented to address them. The audit committee also receives various reports, summaries, or presentations related to the Company’s cybersecurity threats, risk, and mitigation. The audit committee will keep the full board of directors apprised of the company’s cybersecurity risk processes and significant developments related to cybersecurity.
Security program from PagerDuty, Inc.'s Form 10-K for fiscal 2026, filed Mar 12, 2026, Item 1C, in its words (evidence) FedRAMP status from the FedRAMP Marketplace (evidence)
Service statusCSV of PagerDuty's status page incidents · Atom feed of PagerDuty's status page incidents
90 days agotoday
- 10 incidents in 90 days
- 2 major or critical
- 34 min typical time to resolve
- 1 h 46 min longest major
| Began | Incident | Impact | Lasted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Issue Resolved - Delays Across the PagerDuty Platform | major | 34 min | |
| Issue Resolved - Delays Across the PagerDuty Platform | major | 1 h 46 min | |
| Postmortem Published - Delayed escalation of incidents and responder request invitations | minor | 17 min | |
| Event Processing, Notification, and Platform Functionality Issues | minor | 14 min | |
| Issue Identified - Incident Workflows experiencing delays | minor | 1 h 17 min | |
| Issue Identified - Errors utilizing the PagerDuty MCP | minor | 55 min | |
| Event Processing Delays | minor | 32 min | |
| Issue Identified - Notification message | minor | 11 min |
Incidents per month
critical major minor no impact stated before or partly before our history
As PagerDuty's status page reports its own incidents (scheduled maintenance left out), read every few hours since (evidence)
Incidents reported by PagerDuty's subprocessorsCSV of incidents reported by vendors PagerDuty lists · Atom feed of incidents reported by vendors PagerDuty lists
244 reported incidents in the last 30 days, by 13 of the vendors PagerDuty lists as subprocessors.
A subprocessor list names a company, not the service an incident touched. This does not show that PagerDuty was involved.
And 219 more. All of them: CSV · Who is around them.
ChangesCSV of PagerDuty's changes · Atom feed of PagerDuty's changes
See the list as we read it on any date: Time machine
- Changed registry listing: fedramp:FR2310974411 evidence: registry listing: fedramp:FR2310974411