Datadog
Datadog declares 19 subprocessors, plus 15 of its own affiliates, in its subprocessor list, which we last checked on Nov 11, 2026 (evidence). They include Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud and OpenAI. No published changes since we first read it on Sep 21, 2026. 546 tracked vendors name Datadog as a subprocessor, including Salesforce, Twilio and Zendesk.
Subprocessors CSV of Datadog's subprocessors · Atom feed of Datadog's subprocessors DORA draft CSV of Datadog's subprocessors as declared by Datadog what's this? ·
19 third parties, 15 affiliates.
| Name | Purpose | Location | Listed since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Web Services, Inc. | Infrastructure services | Australia; Italy; Japan; United Kingdom; United States | |
| Anthropic, PBC AI | AI services | United States | |
| Baseten Labs, Inc. AI | AI services | United States | |
| Databricks, Inc. | AI services | United States | |
| DDog Singapore PTE. LTD. | Singapore | ||
| Fireworks.ai, Inc. AI | AI services | United States | |
| Google LLC | Email and office applications; Infrastructure services | Germany; United States | |
| Hyperdoc Inc. | Meeting transcription and recording services | United States | |
| Mailgun Technologies, Inc. | Email and office applications | United States | |
| Microsoft Corporation (Azure) | Infrastructure services | United States | |
| Nebius, Inc. | AI services | United States | |
| OpenAI, LLC AI | AI services | United States | |
| Reversing Labs International GmbH | Threat intelligence services | Switzerland | |
| Salesforce, Inc. | Customer support platform | United States | |
| Snowflake, Inc. | Data warehouse services | United States | |
| Together Computer, Inc. AI | AI services | United States | |
| Twilio, Inc. | Communication services | United States | |
| Vonage Business, Inc. | Communication services | United States | |
| Zendesk, Inc. | Customer support platform | United States |
Datadog affiliates (15)
Web TechnologiesCSV of Datadog's web technologies · Atom feed of Datadog's web technologies
Datadog's homepage made 241 requests to 42 domains, 25 services controlled by another company, and 3 domains not identified.
25 third parties by category: Advertising 11Analytics 6Marketing automation 3Tag managers 1Cookie compliance 1CDN 1Other 2
cr-relay.comusbrowserspeed.comd1eoo1tco6rr5e.cloudfront.net
11 tracked companies loaded by the homepage are not in Datadog's subprocessor list. A website can use a service without it processing customer data.
Subprocessor of (546)CSV of the companies listing Datadog · Atom feed of the companies listing Datadog
15Five 15five.com
1Password 1password.com Cloud monitoring
Aaru aaru.com Cloud monitoring; Observability / APM
Abacum abacum.ai Data warehousing of analytics data
AccountsIQ accountsiq.com Engineering; Production management tool
Act Security act.security Monitoring, Logging and Observability
Action1 action1.com SIEM Processing
Actionstep actionstep.com Cloud monitoring; Monitors and analyzes cloud applications and infrastructure performance
Actualyze AI actualyze.ai Core Product Legal Entity: Datadog, Inc.; Logging and telemetry
- Ada Support ada.cx Logging
Adaptive Security adaptivesecurity.com Cloud monitoring; Cloud monitoring and observability platform.
Adobe adobe.com Adobe uses Datadog for real-time user monitoring and logging. Datadog assists Adobe in providing insight into the front-end performance of applications from the perspective of users so that the product can quickly detect poor user experience and resolve issues with context from across the stack. Through Datadog, Adobe can view visualizations of metrics that can indicate issues like slow load times. The information collected is primarily collated metrics, rather than breakdowns of individual’s experiences.
Aerospike aerospike.com Collects and analyzes logs, metrics, and traces from Aerospike services for monitoring and incident response; Observability & monitoring
Age of Learning ageoflearning.com Third party monitoring & logging for parsing, querying and performing analytics on application and infrastructure logs
AgentSync agentsync.io Core Infrastructure and Data Sub-Processor (Manage, Contracting, API)
Aha Labs aha.io
Air air.inc Contact: Privacy Team privacy@datadoghq.com DPA:; Observability
Airbyte airbyte.com Logging & Monitoring
AirCall aircall.io Monitoring for provided services/security purposes.; The security tracking software provided by Datadog monitors our customers' activity (including automated access to personal data) in the Aircall system for the detection of potential security threats and generates security alerts for our teams. If a security violation is detected, we inform you accordingly. This activity is essential for preventing and potentially detecting cyberattacks and thus for Aircall’s protection of your data and the provision of our service in the required and contracted quality.
Airship airship.com Platform and system performance for Apptimize Service
AiSDR aisdr.com Cloud monitoring
Akuity akuity.io observability, logs and monitoring
Alation alation.com Application Synthetic checks and Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Alcide alcide.io
Aleph getaleph.com Application monitoring
Algolia algolia.com Datadog provides log management for Algolia Services. The primary information Datadog has access to is indexing operations, end-user queries, end-user IP addresses.
AllCode allcode.com Infrastructure monitoring, observability, logging, and alerting
Alloy alloy.app Service Monitoring
Allstacks allstacks.com
Altana altana.ai Log Aggregation, Monitoring, and Alerting
Alteryx alteryx.com Logging and monitoring
Amplience amplience.com Security, Monitoring and User Analytics
Amplitude amplitude.com Logging and operational monitoring
Anaconda anaconda.com Monitoring and logging for Anaconda infrastructure
Anecdotes anecdotes.ai Observability
Apollo apollo.io
- AppDirect appdirect.com
Applied Compute appliedcompute.com Cloud monitoring
Aqua Security aquasec.com Observability platform for performance monitoring and troubleshooting
Artie artie.com Monitoring and logging.
Ashby ashbyhq.com Monitor and Analyze Interaction
AssemblyAI assemblyai.com Consolidates metrics to provide operational insights, and workload management; Observability services and logging; Observability, workload management, logging
Attention attention.com
Audienceview audienceview.com Observability platform
Badge trybadge.com Cloud monitoring
Basis Theory basistheory.com Logging and SIEM
Beamery beamery.com Monitors Beamery – ATS integrations.
Belvo belvo.com Monitoring, alerting, and anomaly detection; Observation
Benchling benchling.com In-app monitoring and analytics
BeyondTrust beyondtrust.com Login system (Entitle)
BigID bigid.com Monitoring and Alerting
BigTime bigtime.net
BioRender biorender.com
Bites mybites.io Platform observability and monitoring
Bitfount bitfount.com Cloud monitoring and observability
Bitwarden bitwarden.com Infrastructure monitoring
Bloomfire bloomfire.com Application Monitoring.
Bonusly bonus.ly Application and Infrastructure monitoring
Botdoc botdoc.io Monitoring and Security for Cloud Applications
Braintrust braintrust.dev Event monitoring
Braze braze.com Application performance monitoring, infrastructure and network monitoring, and error capturing. Braze may provide End User metadata, such as user identifiers, to United DataDog for support and application troubleshooting and to improve performance of the Services.
BridgeAthletic bridgeathletic.com Application Performance monitoring Application Security monitoring Application logs
Brightcove brightcove.com Analytics
BrightHire brighthire.com Infrastructure Monitoring and Observability
Browser Use browser-use.com
Bublup bublup.com Cloud monitoring; Core Product
Buffer buffer.com
Bugcrowd bugcrowd.com Browser client IP, login activity, and accidental PII
Buildkite buildkite.com Cloud monitoring and observability platform; Logging and observability
Calendly.com calendly.com Infrastructure performance monitoring and business Analytics
CallTrackingMetrics calltrackingmetrics.com Storing system and event logs
Capcade capcade.com Application performance monitoring and logs
Capsule CRM capsulecrm.com Services for aggregating application logs to help monitor the performance of the Service
Carta carta.com Infrastructure and error monitoring service for cloud-based applications.
Cartesia cartesia.ai Application and infrastructure monitoring and analytics; Cloud monitoring
Catapult Sports catapultsports.com Centralised storage and analysis of software system logs
Cekura cekura.ai IT infrastructure
Cerby cerby.com
Certara certara.com Operational monitoring and analytics (Datadog)
Chainalysis chainalysis.com Application performance monitoring; Log management, interaction observability | [More information](
Chamelio chamelio.ai Cloud monitoring; Monitoring and observability
ChartMogul chartmogul.com We use Datadog for monitoring, observability, troubleshooting, and performance analysis of the ChartMogul platform and services, including ChartMogul's AI-powered features.
Check Point Software Technologies checkpoint.com Infrastructure Monitoring
Checkr checkr.com Cloud Monitoring, Business Analytics
ChurnZero churnzero.com Infrastructure Monitoring, Logging
Clarify clarify.ai Observability
Clarity clarity.com
Claroty claroty.com
Clay clay.com APM and security
ClearMash clearmash.com Observability, security, and log management provider
Clerk clerk.com Cloud infrastructure & monitoring
Clerk Chat clerk.chat
Clever clever.com Log processing
Click2Mail click2mail.com
ClickSend clicksend.com Debugging and monitoring.
ClickUp™ clickup.com Logging and Monitoring
ClientSuccess clientsuccess.com Server / Platform Monitoring / Event Logs
Climatiq climatiq.io Analytics, Reporting; Cloud based log and metrics processing service
Cloudevolve cloudevolve.com Application performance monitoring, logging, and alerting
CloudFiles cloudfiles.io Cloud monitoring
- Show next 50
ComplianceCSV of Datadog's compliance · Atom feed of Datadog's compliance
FedRAMP Marketplace
| Offering | Status | Impact | Agencies | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Datadog for Government | Authorized | High | 13 |
Security program
How Datadog says it manages cybersecurity risk, in its annual report to the SEC.
- Led by
- Chief Information Security Officer
quote
Our Chief Information Security Officer also reports separately to our Audit Committee on cyber and information security risk on a quarterly basis.
- Board oversight
- Audit Committee
quote
This enterprise risk assessment helps inform the internal audit plan, and both the assessment and progress against the internal audit plan are periodically presented to the Audit Committee.
- Frameworks named
- ISO 27001
- SOC 2
- FedRAMP
quote
In addition, certain Datadog products are subject to specific compliance requirements and standards, including, as applicable, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI, and FedRAMP (Moderate), and are tested and evaluated by third-party auditors against those applicable compliance requirements and standards.
- Outside review
- Engages outside assessors or consultants
quote
In addition, certain Datadog products are subject to specific compliance requirements and standards, including, as applicable, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI, and FedRAMP (Moderate), and are tested and evaluated by third-party auditors against those applicable compliance requirements and standards.
- Its own suppliers
- Reviews their security
quote
In addition, we maintain third-party vendor management standards that are used to evaluate cybersecurity risks associated with our third-party service providers, and we assess information technology and software vendors to determine their security posture and maturity.
- Practices named
- Incident response plan
- Penetration testing
- Cyber insurance
Read Item 1C in full
Risk Management and Strategy
We utilize various processes and tools to assess, identify, and manage risks from cybersecurity threats. In the development of our products and features, our security teams work with our engineering and product teams to identify, assess, and agree upon mitigation or remediation measures with respect to product development. On an ongoing basis, we encourage an environment of openness in which our engineering and product teams, led by our security teams, proactively identify, manage and discuss actual or perceived cybersecurity risks. These teams also use automated and manual processes to identify and track risks from cybersecurity threats. The identified risks are triaged, prioritized for remediation, and reported by the security teams to various levels of our senior management, as appropriate. We also deploy technical safeguards that are designed to protect our platform and systems from cybersecurity threats, including firewalls, intrusion prevention, and detection systems. We have established an incident response plan that addresses our response to cybersecurity incidents, and we require periodic training for our employees on cybersecurity threats. In addition, we maintain cybersecurity insurance, however, the costs related to cybersecurity threats or disruptions may not be fully insured.
In addition, we maintain third-party vendor management standards that are used to evaluate cybersecurity risks associated with our third-party service providers, and we assess information technology and software vendors to determine their security posture and maturity. All vendors that process our data or access our systems go through a security and privacy review before they are engaged that is targeted to the services to be provided and the systems and data involved. Based on the information provided by the vendor and depending on the nature of the services provided, our vendor management process may involve security questionnaires and contractual obligations such as audit rights and breach reporting.
We also periodically perform various types of security audits and assessments, including penetration tests, via internal and external parties. In addition, certain Datadog products are subject to specific compliance requirements and standards, including, as applicable, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI, and FedRAMP (Moderate), and are tested and evaluated by third-party auditors against those applicable compliance requirements and standards. The identified risks from such audits and assessments are triaged, prioritized, reported by our security teams to various levels of our senior management and tracked and remediated depending on the severity.
Our internal audit function conducts annual interviews across business groups to identify key areas of risk, including cybersecurity risk. This enterprise risk assessment helps inform the internal audit plan, and both the assessment and progress against the internal audit plan are periodically presented to the Audit Committee. Our Chief Information Security Officer also reports separately to our Audit Committee on cyber and information security risk on a quarterly basis.
We have previously and may in the future become the target of cyber-attacks by third parties seeking unauthorized access to our or our customers’ data or to disrupt our ability to provide our services. As a result, we have expended and plan to continue to expend significant resources in an effort to protect against security incidents and to mitigate, detect, and remediate actual and potential vulnerabilities. Notwithstanding the measures and processes we take to manage cybersecurity risk, there is no guarantee that these measures and processes will be successful in preventing or mitigating a cybersecurity incident that could have a material adverse effect on us. For a description of the risks from cybersecurity threats that may materially affect the Company and how those risks may affect the Company, see our risk factors under Part 1. Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including without limitation “Strategic and Operational Risks—If we or the third parties with whom we work experience, or are unable to protect against cyber-attacks, ransomware, security incidents, or security breaches, or if unauthorized parties otherwise obtain access to or otherwise compromise our customers’ data, our data, or our platform and information technology systems, then our solution may be perceived as not being secure, our reputation may be harmed, demand for our platform and products may be reduced, and we may incur significant liabilities or additional expenses.”
Governance
Our Board of Directors has delegated its oversight of risks associated with cybersecurity to its Audit Committee. Generally, each quarter, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses with our Chief Information Security Officer material cybersecurity risks and our processes for assessing, identifying, and managing such risks, and the Audit Committee will receive updates as necessary between each quarterly meeting. In the event of a material cybersecurity incident, the Audit Committee will be notified, and the Board of Directors will also receive updates on cybersecurity risks and incidents, as appropriate.
Our Chief Information Security Officer and Chief Technology Officer are the members of our executive team who are principally responsible for overseeing our cybersecurity risk management program. Our Chief Information Security Officer and Chief Technology Officer are informed about cybersecurity threats through their involvement with the processes set forth above. For example, our Chief Information Security Officer receives regular reports on identified cybersecurity risks and progress toward remediation from our security teams and both our Chief Information Security Officer and Chief Technology Officer are notified of cybersecurity incidents and the management of such incidents in accordance with the escalation procedures of our incident response plan.
We believe these members of our executive team have the appropriate expertise, background, and experience to manage risks arising from cybersecurity threats. Alexis Lê-Quôc is one of the co-founders of our company and has served as our Chief Technology Officer and a member of our board of directors since June 2010. Mr. Lê-Quôc has extensive knowledge and experience from building and leading the development of our technology and from his decades of experience in the technology industry. Prior to co-founding Datadog, Mr. Lê-Quôc worked at Wireless Generation from March 2004 to December 2010, where he most recently served as Director of Live Operations. Previously, Mr. Lê-Quôc held engineering positions at a number of technology and software companies, including IBM Research and France Télécom S.A. Mr. Lê-Quôc received his M.S. in Computer Science from CentraleSupélec. Emilio Escobar has served as our Chief Information Security Officer since September 2020. With two decades of experience in information security and compliance, Mr. Escobar has worked at large enterprises, medium-sized companies, and governmental organizations. Previously, Mr. Escobar served as the Vice President of Information Security for Hulu, where he played a pivotal role in setting up key security functions. Prior to that, Mr. Escobar worked for PlayStation, where he built and ran the software security teams. Mr. Escobar holds a BS in Computer Science from the University of Puerto Rico.
Security program from Datadog, Inc.'s Form 10-K for fiscal 2025, filed Feb 18, 2026, Item 1C, in its words (evidence) FedRAMP status from the FedRAMP Marketplace (evidence)
Service statusCSV of Datadog's status page incidents · Atom feed of Datadog's status page incidents
90 days agotoday
- 9 incidents in 90 days
- 2 major or critical
- 56 min typical time to resolve
- 2 h 29 min longest major
| Began | Incident | Impact | Lasted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metrics query are disrupted | major | 2 h 29 min | |
| Elevated Error Rates for Workflow Automation, App Builder, Bits Code, Bits Agent Builder | major | 56 min | |
| Delayed RUM sessions | no impact stated | 2 h 17 min | |
| Delayed Events | minor | 48 min | |
| Users are unable to acknowledge, escalate, or resolve On-Call Pages | minor | 27 min | |
| Delayed Monitors Notifications | minor | 46 min | |
| Delayed events triggered by emails | minor | 1 h 35 min | |
| Delayed CICD Optimization, Code Coverage, Code Security, and DORA data | minor | 5 h 40 min |
Incidents per month
critical major minor no impact stated
Components affected
| Component | Incidents | Bar |
|---|---|---|
| RUM | 3 | |
| APM | 2 | |
| Bits AI | 2 | |
| CI Visibility | 2 | |
| Cloud Network Monitoring | 2 | |
| Incident Response | 2 | |
| Monitors | 2 | |
| App Builder | 1 |
As Datadog's status page reports its own incidents (scheduled maintenance left out), read every few hours since (evidence)
Incidents reported by Datadog's subprocessorsCSV of incidents reported by vendors Datadog lists · Atom feed of incidents reported by vendors Datadog lists
347 reported incidents in the last 30 days, by 8 of the vendors Datadog lists as subprocessors.
A subprocessor list names a company, not the service an incident touched. This does not show that Datadog was involved.
And 322 more. All of them: CSV · Who is around them.
ChangesCSV of Datadog's changes · Atom feed of Datadog's changes
See the list as we read it on any date: Time machine
None since tracking began.